When purchasing property, especially in shared ownership scenarios, understanding the differences between joint tenancy and tenancy in common is crucial. Each legal arrangement has its own set of rules regarding ownership, inheritance, and transferability. In this article, we’ll explore the key differences to help you make an informed decision.
1. Ownership Structure
Joint Tenancy:
- Equal Ownership: In joint tenancy, each co-owner holds an equal share of the property. For example, if two people own a property as joint tenants, each has a 50% interest, regardless of their financial contribution.
- Right of Survivorship: A defining feature is the right of survivorship. This means that if one owner dies, their share automatically transfers to the surviving co-owner(s), bypassing the deceased’s will or probate process.
Example:
Imagine John and Mary, a married couple, purchase a condominium in Singapore for SGD 2,000,000 as joint tenants. Under joint tenancy, both John and Mary own an equal 50% share.
- Scenario: Unfortunately, if Mary passes away, her 50% interest automatically transfers to John through the right of survivorship.
- Case Study Insight: This arrangement simplifies estate planning for many couples by ensuring that the surviving spouse maintains full control over the property without needing to go through probate. However, it also means that Mary’s share cannot be left to another beneficiary, even if that was her wish.
Tenancy in Common:
- Proportional Ownership: Co-owners in tenancy in common can hold unequal shares. For instance, one person may own 60% while another owns 40% of the property.
- No Right of Survivorship: Unlike joint tenancy, there is no automatic transfer of interest upon death. Each owner’s share can be passed on according to their will or state laws, which means beneficiaries could be non-owners.
Example:
Now, consider two business partners, Alex and Ben, who invest in a commercial property together for SGD 2,000,000. Alex contributes 60% of the capital, and Ben contributes 40%. They choose to hold the property as tenants in common.
- Scenario: Unfortunately, if Mary passes away, her 50% interest automatically transfers to John through the right of survivorship.
- Case Study Insight: This arrangement simplifies estate planning for many couples by ensuring that the surviving spouse maintains full control over the property without needing to go through probate. However, it also means that Mary’s share cannot be left to another beneficiary, even if that was her wish.
2. Flexibility and Transferability
Joint Tenancy:
- Limited Flexibility: Joint tenants typically cannot sell or transfer their share independently without dissolving the joint tenancy. If one owner decides to sell, it often requires the consent of the other co-owners.
- Unified Decision-Making: All joint tenants usually need to agree on major decisions regarding the property, which can be both a strength and a challenge.
Example:
For close family members like siblings, joint tenancy is sometimes chosen to ensure unity. For example, Sarah and Emily jointly inherit a property from their parents and hold it as joint tenants.
- Scenario: If Sarah decides to sell her share, doing so can be complex because joint tenancy typically requires all owners’ consent.
- Case Study Insight: This limitation means that joint tenants must be prepared to work closely together when making decisions about selling or refinancing, which can be beneficial in fostering mutual trust but might restrict individual flexibility.
Tenancy in Common:
- Greater Flexibility: Each tenant in common can independently sell, bequeath, or transfer their share without needing consent from other co-owners. This arrangement provides more control over individual ownership interests. However if there is an existing mortgage loan agreement, restructuring consent/approval must be provided by the mortgagee/lender due to changes in ownership structure which could impact borrowing conditions and eligibility.
- Customized Arrangements: Because the ownership percentages can vary, it allows for more customized arrangements, especially when co-owners contribute different amounts towards the property purchase.
Example:
Consider a scenario where three friends, Lisa, Mark, and David, purchase an investment property together as tenants in common. Their ownership percentages are 40%, 35%, and 25%, respectively, based on their contributions.
- Scenario: Later, Mark decides he wants to exit the investment. Because the property is held as tenants in common, Mark can independently sell his share to a third party without needing the approval of Lisa or David.
- Case Study Insight: This structure provides greater flexibility for individual exit strategies, making it a popular choice among non-related investors. However, it may also lead to future disputes if the new co-owner’s goals differ significantly from the original partners.
3. Estate Planning and Inheritance
Joint Tenancy:
- Immediate Succession: The right of survivorship means that the deceased’s interest automatically goes to the surviving joint tenant(s). This can simplify estate planning but may also limit the deceased’s ability to leave their share to someone outside of the joint ownership.
- Bypassing Probate: Since the interest passes directly to the surviving owner(s), the property generally avoids the probate process, which can save time and legal fees.
Example:
John and Mary’s joint tenancy arrangement ensures that if one spouse dies, the entire property remains in the hands of the surviving spouse.
- Scenario: This can simplify the transfer of property upon death, but it also limits the decedent’s ability to distribute their share according to personal wishes (for instance, splitting the property among children).
- Case Study Insight: For many families, this automatic transfer is advantageous, but others may prefer the flexibility offered by tenancy in common to align with broader estate planning goals.
Tenancy in Common:
- Control Over Inheritance: Owners can designate beneficiaries for their share of the property. This means you can leave your portion to family members, charities, or others as you see fit.
- Probate Involvement: The transfer of ownership upon death may require going through probate, which can take longer and incur additional costs.
Example:
In a tenancy in common arrangement, each owner’s share is treated as a separate asset. For example, consider an elderly couple, Mr. and Mrs. Tan, who own a landed property as tenants in common. They decide that in the event of one passing away, their share will be inherited by their respective children.
- Scenario: If Mr. Tan dies, his 50% interest is distributed as specified in his will, potentially giving one child a larger share than the other if that is his wish.
- Case Study Insight: This approach offers tailored inheritance options, enabling each co-owner to designate beneficiaries independently. However, the downside is that the property might become fragmented among multiple heirs, complicating future management or sale of the property.
4. Practical Considerations
When deciding between joint tenancy and tenancy in common, consider the following:
- Relationship Between Co-Owners: Joint tenancy is often favored by married couples or family members who want the security of the right of survivorship. Tenancy in common is more common among friends, business partners, or investors who need flexibility in ownership stakes.
- Estate Planning Goals: If you wish to control the distribution of your share after death, tenancy in common may be more suitable. However, if your primary goal is to ensure seamless transfer of ownership without probate, joint tenancy could be the better option.
- Future Changes in Ownership: Tenancy in common offers more flexibility if you foresee changes in ownership or if individual co-owners might want to sell or transfer their share in the future.
Conclusion
Both joint tenancy and tenancy in common have their unique advantages and limitations. Joint tenancy provides simplicity and ease of transfer through the right of survivorship, making it ideal for close-knit relationships. On the other hand, tenancy in common offers flexibility and personalized control over individual shares, which is beneficial for diverse ownership arrangements.
Understanding these differences is key to aligning your property ownership strategy with your financial goals, relationship dynamics, and estate planning needs. Always consider consulting a legal or financial advisor to ensure you choose the arrangement that best suits your situation.
Contact us now to schedule a personalised and free consultation.